Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

The Newsmakers: Back to the Cold War?

Richard Weitz

Russia has declared it is pulling out of a longstanding nuclear agreement with the U.S. - what does this mean for relations between Moscow and D.C.?...

Watch Now

The Best Way to Defeat the Islamic State and Succeed in Syria? Push Back on Putin.

Peter Rough

Secretary of State John Kerry has been calling for a hardline against Russia; it’s time for the Obama administration to listen....

Continue Reading

Ike vs. Obama in the Middle East

Michael Doran

One of them learned from his mistakes, re-examined his fundamental assumptions, and changed course as necessary....

Continue Reading