Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in theĀ Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

History Repeats Itself

Ronald Radosh

Young radicals of the 1960s and '70s received their Ph.D.s and began their "long march through the institutions." They now dominate the profession....

Continue Reading

Terror Attacks Cannot Save Islam's 'Honour'

Husain Haqqani

Dealing with causes of Muslim decline, not random or orchestrated acts of terrorism, would be the real way forward in saving Muslims from dishonor....

Continue Reading

Paris Terror Attacks: The Islamist Goal of Global Silence

Naser Khader

We simply cannot allow fundamentalists to threaten us to silence....

Continue Reading