Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

Is War Coming to the South China Sea?

Arthur Herman

Obama’s fecklessness in pushing back against China is only escalating the conflict in the Western Pacific...

Continue Reading

Blasphemy Laws and Censorship by States and Non-State Actors: Examining Global Threats to Freedom of Expression

Nina Shea

As a foreign policy priority, the United States should make an unapologetic defense of free speech in every appropriate forum....

Watch Now

Reflections on the Second Lebanon War

Lee Smith

The next conflict with Israel will be much worse for Hezbollah and Lebanon....

Continue Reading