Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

Japan's Strategic Role in Southeast Asia: A Cause for Concern?

John Lee

Japan’s strategic interest in Southeast Asia is primarily motivated by concerns about China’s rise and its impact on stability in East Asia....

View PDF

The Iran-ISIS Connection

Lee Smith

To defeat the Islamic State, the Obama administration is going to have to turn against Iran first....

Continue Reading

OPEC's Fool's Errand

Arthur Herman

Look for U.S. shale oil production to continue to sprint ahead, with America's dominance of world's energy markets as the finish line....

Continue Reading