Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

Wanted: A Modern-Day MacArthur

Arthur Herman

Arthur Herman on his new biography of the legendary general and lessons for today’s war fighters....

Watch Now

Amid Dissent at State, Obama Stays the Bloody Course on Syria

Lee Smith

Instead of ousting Assad, President Obama is promising the Syrian despot more life, even as he bleeds the country he once ruled dry....

Continue Reading

Are the Palestinians Thinking the Unthinkable?

Adam Garfinkle & Walter Russell Mead

In secret negotiations, Abbas told the Israeli opposition leader he would be willing to give up the "right of return."...

Continue Reading