Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in theĀ Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

The Danger of What Hasn't Been Said

Sarah May Stern

Isn't Israel's security "non-negotiable," too?...

Continue Reading

Remember the Carter Doctrine

Max Boot & Michael Doran

A better way forward in the Middle East....

Continue Reading

America's New Maritime Strategy: How Will China Respond?

Bryan McGrath

A competition is on, and both sides are now acknowledging it. There is far less room for nuance now....

Continue Reading