Skip to main content

NATO’s Missile Defense Counteroffensive to Ukraine

Richard Weitz

In addition to imposing more Western sanctions on Russia and rotating more U.S. troops into Europe, the U.S. and its NATO allies are considering increasing U.S. ballistic missile defenses (BMD) based in NATO’s European member states as part of their response to Russian actions in Ukraine. Moscow clearly hates these U.S. systems, and placing them near Russia is sure to capture Moscow’s attention. A few weeks ago, a pair of Russian warplanes “buzzed” a U.S. missile defense ship that was on patrol in the Black Sea. That said, the U.S. missile defense response needs to be nuanced to yield net benefits to Western security.

In particular, it would be a mistake to resurrect the plan of the George W. Bush administration to base 10 ground-based interceptors in Poland and a powerful X-Band radar in the Czech Republic. The Obama administration canceled these plans in 2009 and instead rolled out a European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) that sought to respond more directly to Iran’s progress in developing shorter-range missile systems. In March 2013, the Obama administration canceled on technical and cost grounds the fourth and final phase of the EPAA, under which the United States would have designed new Standard Missile (SM) SM-3 Block IIB long-range interceptors and placed them in eastern Europe with the mission of intercepting Iranian intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) launched toward the United States. …

Click here to read the full article.

Related Articles

Zone Defense

Lee Smith

Sykes-Picot at 100....

Continue Reading

Obama's Hiroshima Visit Is Hypocrisy

Arthur Herman

The president’s very appearance at Hiroshima bears the hallmark of an apology, regardless of the words he utters....

Continue Reading

Up All Night in Paris

Irwin M. Stelzer

The French government has finally decided to tackle one symptom of the nation's sclerotic economy: youth unemployment....

Continue Reading