Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

Why We Need to Hear Netanyahu

Mike Rogers & Michael Doran

Not only is it his right to speak, he will touch off a needed debate on the Iran nuclear deal....

Continue Reading

Allah Versus KFC

Mokhtar Awad & Samuel Tadros

How an unlikely American ideologue is inspiring Egypt’s new generation of Islamic militants....

Continue Reading

Senate Republicans Bungle Their Interrogation of Janet Yellen

Brendan Brown

In terms of theatrical impact, the first performance of the Republican majority in the Senate responding to semi-annual testimony from Fed Chair Yelle...

Continue Reading