Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

Turkey and EU to Break Up

Walter Russell Mead

They weren't married—just dating—but the end of the relationship augurs an important geopolitical turning point....

Continue Reading

Agonía en Alepo

Jaime Daremblum

Lo que sucede en la zona oriental de Alepo desafía las normas internacionales y los valores humanitarios que deberían imperar en torno a poblaciones...

Continue Reading

How President Trump Approaches National Security and Foreign Policy

Rebeccah L. Heinrichs

Rebeccah Heinrichs joined Ben Domenech on The Federalist Radio Hour to discuss what national security and foreign policy in the Trump administration l...

Continue Reading