Skip to main content

The Obama Doctrine Defined

Douglas J. Feith & Seth Cropsey

The words “vacillating” and “aimless” are commonly used by both left and right to describe President Barack Obama’s approach to the Libya war. His political friends and foes alike lament that he has no clear goal in Libyaand that, by failing to articulate one, he is revealing his unease at having been dragged into the fight to oust the regime of Muammar Qaddafi.

Democratic Senator James Webb of Virginia issued a press release on March 21, 2011, noting that the U.S. mission in Libya “lacks clarity.” Former Republican Senator Slade Gorton wrote in the Washington Post: “We should never enter a war halfway and with an indecisive goal. Regrettably, that is where we stand today.”

The criticism has some validity, but it misses an important point: the administration’s approach has logic and coherence in the service of strategic considerations that extend far beyond Libya. . . .

Click here to read the full text of this article.

Related Articles

What Pakistan Knew About the Bin Laden Raid

Husain Haqqani

As Islamabad’s ambassador to Washington, I had an intimate view of the Pakistani response to the SEAL Team 6 operation. But I still have questions....

Continue Reading

Region Needs Japan as a Counterweight to China

John Lee

What Japan is fighting for this time promises to bring far-reaching benefits, in Asia and beyond....

Continue Reading

Iran Sends a Message to the West at the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference

Rebeccah L. Heinrichs

Obama’s State Department believes that if it forgives Iran, Tehran may begin conducting itself as a peaceful, tolerant, now-almost-nuclear world power...

Continue Reading