Skip to main content

Security-Paralyzed Diplomacy: An Internal Critic Attacks Our Barricaded Embassies

Ann Marlowe

As we meditate on the lessons of our failure in Afghanistan, one that’s easy to diagnose is the isolation of the American State Department presence there. In Afghanistan—and Iraq, Pakistan, and even in Libya, where it can be argued there is no threat to our personnel—American diplomats are unable to travel on short notice or using ordinary cars. Typically our consulates and embassies are highly fortified compounds in remote suburbs. Even for an American citizen, getting inside the Kabul embassy is a big deal, involving a quarter mile walk to the first checkpoint, an airport-style security check, and the surrender of one’s mobile phone at the security desk.

As for getting out—forget about it! Our diplomats are often required to travel by armored cars, usually in scarce supply, which makes it difficult for them to get outside and actually learn what’s going on in the country. In many places, they have to give travel plans to their security chief 48 hours in advance, making it almost impossible to react to events in real time, much less to shape them. While such constraints often hinder most nations’ diplomats, American officials face particularly stringent rules.

Luckily, a few of them seem inclined to do something about it.

Click here to read the full text of this piece.

Related Articles

The Impossible Quest for Absolute Security

Richard Weitz

Demands for perfect security by one nation, without regard for others, heighten anxiety and prompt unnecessary weapons buildup...

Continue Reading

Reading the News in Tehran

Martha Bayles

What the critics get wrong about RFE-RL’s Persian language news service, Radio Farda...

Continue Reading

David Satter on Trump, Putin, and Russia

David Satter

The Center for Security Policy's Secure Freedom Radio Podcast...

Listen Now