Skip to main content
Don't Entrust Jerusalem to the Muslims or the Jews (or the French)
A group of British soldiers in the court of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 1917 in Jerusalem. (Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

Don't Entrust Jerusalem to the Muslims or the Jews (or the French)

Douglas J. Feith

In his essay in Mosaic on diplomacy, law, and Jerusalem, the estimable Michel Gurfinkiel asks, “What is international law?” and comments, “It’s easy enough to doubt, if not to mock, the idea that there is such a thing.” It sure is. The last century of U.S. policy on Jerusalem is a tale of cynicism and sanctimony that makes one wonder whether U.S. officials ever take international law seriously.

The Holy City commanded little international attention in the 700 or so years after Muslims defeated the Christian Crusaders. That changed, however, in December 1917, when British forces captured Jerusalem from the Ottomans in World War I. The city and its holy places became a diplomatic issue. British officials spoke passionately of their duty to keep the city and its holy sites under Christian—and specifically British—control.

Handing it all back to the Muslims was out of the question for the men who led the British Empire. Even those who were pro-Zionist, such as Prime Minister David Lloyd George, couldn’t quite imagine Jews in charge of the city, with authority over the Church of the Holy Sepulcher and the Garden of Gethsemane. Nor was Lloyd George receptive to claims of interest in Jerusalem by the French, whom he scorned as “atheistic” or, in any event, Roman Catholic.

For the 30 years after World War I, Britain administered Palestine. Its officials established Jerusalem, naturally, as the seat of government there. Mostly Protestants, they quarreled with Vatican representatives and Eastern Orthodox Church clerics over various municipal matters, but one thing they all agreed on was that the city could not be entrusted to Muslims or Jews.

That was the origin of the idea that, when Palestine is eventually partitioned between the Jews and the Arabs, Jerusalem should be internationalized.

Read the full article in Mosaic Magazine.

Related Articles

‘Chances Are Good’ of a 'Monumental' China Trade Deal: Pillsbury

Michael Pillsbury

In an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business, Michael Pillsbury discusses the impact the Hong Kong protests could have on the US-China trade n...

Watch Now

Asia Bibi, Modern Confessor of the Faith

Nina Shea

A drama of faithfulness, courage and perseverance, in which good ultimately triumphs. It is also a window into the importance of the struggle to defen...

Continue Reading

US Sanctions, and Iran Sanctions in Particular, Are Just

Rebeccah L. Heinrichs

The United States is exercising prudence in its employment of sanctions, a tool short of military force, to try to compel the Iranian regime to change...

Continue Reading