Skip to main content
Why the Middle East Policies Favored by Sanders and Warren Would Be Counterproductive
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman arrives at the Future Investment Initiative FII conference in the Saudi capital Riyadh. (GIUSEPPE CACACE/AFP/Getty Images)
(Getty Images)

Why the Middle East Policies Favored by Sanders and Warren Would Be Counterproductive

Mike Watson

As Democrats prepare for their second round of presidential-primary debates this week, many of the contenders for the nomination are rolling out their foreign-policy platforms to try to pass the commander-in-chief test. Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who are competing to emerge as the standard-bearer of the party’s progressives, are at the head of that pack and have already given major speeches about global affairs. Unfortunately, their Middle East policies would be disastrous for the United States and would empower the very autocracies they claim to oppose.

Sanders and Warren have landed on strikingly similar foreign-policy stances. Both candidates would reorient American foreign policy toward defending embattled democracies against autocracies that are meddling in elections worldwide and are harnessing social media to turbocharge their traditional propaganda and misinformation activities. Both also believe that it is vitally important to ensure that American foreign and domestic policies work in greater harmony to benefit the American people.

Sanders, who in the 2016 primary was completely untroubled by the similarity of his and Donald Trump’s NATO policies, has this time around chosen Saudi Arabia as his foreign-policy test case and as the issue on which he intends to draw a contrast with Trump. Accordingly, he’s gone after the House of Saud hammer and tongs, cosponsoring legislation to pare back U.S. support for the Saudi intervention in Yemen and announcing that “it is time for us to thoroughly re-evaluate that relationship” with Riyadh. Warren has followed suit.

That this stance is politically popular is not surprising. The American desire to embrace democratic ideals in their foreign policy and to oppose autocracy dates back at least as far as Thomas Jefferson’s sympathy for the French Revolution. Moreover, the Saudis have never been ideologically comfortable partners: Their regime’s principles are alien to most Americans, their support for Wahhabism is dangerous, and their human-rights record is gruesome. Even relatively moderate Democratic candidates such as former vice president Joe Biden have proclaimed their distaste for the Saudis.

***

Read the full article in National Review.

Related Articles

‘Chances Are Good’ of a 'Monumental' China Trade Deal: Pillsbury

Michael Pillsbury

In an interview with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business, Michael Pillsbury discusses the impact the Hong Kong protests could have on the US-China trade n...

Watch Now

Iran Denies U.S. Claim It was Involved in Drone Attacks on Saudi Oil Facilities

Michael Pregent

In an interview with Kristen Fisher on Fox News, Michael Pregent speaks on Iran's involvement in the strikes on Saudi oil facilities. ...

Watch Now

US Sanctions, and Iran Sanctions in Particular, Are Just

Rebeccah L. Heinrichs

The United States is exercising prudence in its employment of sanctions, a tool short of military force, to try to compel the Iranian regime to change...

Continue Reading