Skip to main content
Did FTC v. Qualcomm Create an Antitrust Duty to License SEPs?
Federal Trade Commission building in Washington, DC

Did FTC v. Qualcomm Create an Antitrust Duty to License SEPs?

Urška Petrovčič

In May 2019, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a decision in FTC v. Qualcomm. She found that Qualcomm violated the Sherman Act by, among other things, refusing to offer a license to its standard essential patents (“SEPs”) to rival manufacturers of baseband processor modems. Some commentators have suggested that the effects of Judge Koh’s judgment transcend the litigation brought against Qualcomm and create for SEP holders a general duty to offer a license to SEPs to component manufacturers. However, Judge Koh’s conclusions about the existence of an antitrust duty to license have little support in either the facts of the case or in courts’ prior decisions. It is questionable whether they will survive the scrutiny of the Ninth Circuit or, upon further appeal, the Supreme Court of the United States.

Read the full article in the CPI Antitrust Chronicle

Related Articles

How Would Big Tech Fare Under Biden?

Kirk R. Arner & Harold Furchtgott-​Roth

Despite ongoing legal battles, "it’s becoming increasingly likely that former Vice President Joe Biden will win()":https://www.wsj.com/articles/this...

Continue Reading

Heart to Heart: How the U.S. and Taiwan Can Save the Chip Industry From China

Robert Spalding

Semiconductors are the “heart” of the American tech industry; it is the silicon in these chips from which Silicon Valley derives its name. Semicon...

Continue Reading

Can AI Make Your Job More Interesting?

Dan Patt & John Paschkewitz

Sixty years ago, in an era of computer mainframes and slide rules, J.C.R. Licklider of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) outlined ...

Continue Reading