Skip to main content
Direct Investment Shows Importance of US Relationship

Direct Investment Shows Importance of US Relationship

John Lee

Back in 2014, then foreign minister Julie Bishop raised eyebrows when she described the US, not China, as our most important economic relationship. The argument was that one ought to consider foreign direct investment and not just trade in making an assessment.

US ambassador Arthur Culvahouse made a similar argument which was reported in these pages this month. Going against the common wisdom that China is well entrenched as Australia’s most important economic partner, Culvahouse pointed to the $1.6 trillion two-way investment between the US and Australia. This is on top of the US remaining our third-largest two-way trading partner.

Many will view with scepticism the comments by the ambassador given the increase in two-way trade and foreign direct investment with China that has occurred since Bishop made her comments. But we need to get the economics right if we are to better debate how best to position Australia vis-a-vis the two largest economies in the world. Bishop was correct back then and Culvahouse is correct now.

Read the full article in The Australian here

Related Articles

The Huawei Security Threat

Robert Spalding

In an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Rob Spalding discusses the security threat posed by Huawei....

Watch Now

The State of Religious Liberty in China

Nina Shea

A discussion on the persecution of Christians and other religious minorities, the widespread use of technology, and how the U.S. can leverage their tr...

Continue Reading

Transcript: U.S.-Indonesia Relations at 70: History, Policy, and the Future

Patrick M. Cronin

Full transcript of the July 9, 2019 Hudson event titled "U.S.-Indonesia Relations at 70: History, Policy, and the Future"...

Continue Reading