Skip to main content

The Clash of the Counter-Bureaucracy and Development

Andrew Natsios

One of the little understood, but most powerful and disruptive tensions in established aid agencies lies in the clash between the compliance side of aid programsthe counter-bureaucracyand the technical, programmatic side. The essential balance between these two in development programs has now been skewed to such a degree in the U.S. aid system (and in the World Bank as well) that the imbalance threatens program integrity. The counter-bureaucracy ignores a central principle of development theorythat those development programs that are most precisely and easily measured are the least transformational, and those programs that are most transformational are the least measurable. Relieving the tension between the counter-bureaucracy and development practice would require implementing new measurement systems, conducting more research on overregulation and its effects, reducing the layers of oversight and regulation, and aligning programmatic goals with organizational incentives.

View PDF

Related Articles

Software Eats the Nonprofit World

William A. Schambra

We desperately need a deliberate and encompassing conversation about the appropriateness of high tech values and devices for nonprofit work....

Continue Reading

A New Iron Curtain

Bryan Schwartz

Over the last five years, the Russian Federation has been criticized by international NGOs over the administration of elections, the national ban on ...

Continue Reading

Both More and No More: The Historical Split between Charity and Philanthropy

Benjamin Soskis

In the urtext of modern philanthropy, “The Gospel of Wealth (1889),” Andrew Carnegie set out to instruct his peers on the proper means of disposin...

View PDF