Skip to main content

The Clash of the Counter-Bureaucracy and Development

Andrew Natsios

One of the little understood, but most powerful and disruptive tensions in established aid agencies lies in the clash between the compliance side of aid programsthe counter-bureaucracyand the technical, programmatic side. The essential balance between these two in development programs has now been skewed to such a degree in the U.S. aid system (and in the World Bank as well) that the imbalance threatens program integrity. The counter-bureaucracy ignores a central principle of development theorythat those development programs that are most precisely and easily measured are the least transformational, and those programs that are most transformational are the least measurable. Relieving the tension between the counter-bureaucracy and development practice would require implementing new measurement systems, conducting more research on overregulation and its effects, reducing the layers of oversight and regulation, and aligning programmatic goals with organizational incentives.

View PDF

Related Articles

Defeating the Chinese Communist Party: What Role for Philanthropists?

Tim Morrison

In her seminal work on the history of the philanthropic community’s role in winning the Cold War (“Victory”), Nadia Schadlow methodically indexe...

Continue Reading

Carnegie’s Midnight Confession

William A. Schambra

Sometime this past Summer, Eric Isaacs, president of the Carnegie Institution for Science, issued a formal apology for his organization’s role in the ...

Continue Reading

Is the Philanthropic Elite a Scourge of Democracy or Its Guarantor?

William A. Schambra

Americans are sick of foundations and other elite institutions that ‘know best’...

Continue Reading