Skip to main content

Defining Relevant Markets for Mergers and Acquisitions Involving Communications Services

Harold Furchtgott-Roth & Jeffrey Li

Over the past twenty years, the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice have reviewed many mergers in the communications sector. Without quantitative analyses, the federal agencies have consistently defined unchanging separate relevant markets for wireline and wireless services for antitrust reviews. The agencies have incentives not to change relevant market definitions, although both new technologies and aggregate data likely support new relevant market definitions. A contemporary relevant market definition may include both wireline and wireless services.

View PDF

Related Articles

Corrosive Legal Uncertainty Remains after DC Circuit’s Rehearing Denial in “Net Neutrality” Case

Arielle Roth

The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit denied the request for en banc rehearing in US Telecom v. FCC, better known as the “net neutrality” case....

Continue Reading

The Economic Value of Property Rights Concepts in Spectrum, Both With and Without Licenses

Harold Furchtgott-​Roth

Licensed spectrum has enormous economic value in the United States, but spectrum without licenses has large and rapidly growing value....

View PDF

Consumers Will Still Have Choices

Robert M. McDowell

FCC’s privacy regime created more questions than it answered....

Continue Reading