Skip to main content

The New Israel and the Old

Walter Russell Mead & Michael Doran

Realist foreign policy is premised on the idea that states always act in their own interest, as defined by the rational calculation of external threats from rival states. To scholars and practitioners of the realist school, America’s support for Israel is irrational, for in the support of the Jewish State realists see no benefit to American interest. Some have concluded that a small and influential political lobby is to blame for America’s support for Israel. In this video, Walter Russell Mead revisits his 2008 essay “The New Israel and the Old,” which argued that America is pro-Israel because Americans—particularly non-Jewish Americans in the heartland—are pro-Israel.

As a part of Tikvah’s advanced institute, “Is Israel Alone?: The Past, Present, and Future of the U.S.-Israel Relationship” Walter Russell Mead and Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Michael Doran examine the false assumptions of so-called realists and explore the popular convictions that are the true foundation of America’s historic support for Israel.

Related Articles

Trump Should Address the Nation About Winning the China Challenge

Rebeccah L. Heinrichs

The COVID-19 pandemic has thrown the China challenge into fuller view. A new Pew Research poll shows...

Continue Reading

Russia Flouts Another Treaty. So We're Leaving It.

Tim Morrison

Arms control treaties can be a powerful national security tool. But too often arms control proponents — those who seek to control weapons by agreeme...

Continue Reading

In Search of Wise Statecraft on China

Patrick M. Cronin

The acceleration of U.S.-China rivalry is failing to produce an intelligent consensus over an effective response. Extreme voices drown out sensible vi...

Continue Reading