Skip to main content

The New Israel and the Old

Walter Russell Mead & Michael Doran

Realist foreign policy is premised on the idea that states always act in their own interest, as defined by the rational calculation of external threats from rival states. To scholars and practitioners of the realist school, America’s support for Israel is irrational, for in the support of the Jewish State realists see no benefit to American interest. Some have concluded that a small and influential political lobby is to blame for America’s support for Israel. In this video, Walter Russell Mead revisits his 2008 essay “The New Israel and the Old,” which argued that America is pro-Israel because Americans—particularly non-Jewish Americans in the heartland—are pro-Israel.

As a part of Tikvah’s advanced institute, “Is Israel Alone?: The Past, Present, and Future of the U.S.-Israel Relationship” Walter Russell Mead and Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Michael Doran examine the false assumptions of so-called realists and explore the popular convictions that are the true foundation of America’s historic support for Israel.

Related Articles

Culture and Religion Divide Europe, Affecting US-Europe Relations

Peter Rough

Today’s continent is fractured along fault lines that are only growing wider....

Continue Reading

The Fault Lines Behind Trump-Moon Summit

Patrick M. Cronin

A Moon-Trump press conference at the White House is unlikely to erase festering doubts about bilateral relations or Kim Jong Un....

Continue Reading

What's The State Of U.S. Foreign Policy?

Walter Russell Mead

In a radio interview with KJZZ, Walter Russell Mead discussed U.S. foreign policy in the Trump administration, including threats from Russia and China...

Listen Now