Skip to main content
‘The Last Shah’ Review: A Purely Domestic Conspiracy
Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi arrives in Tehran after a week in exile, August, 1953.
Bettmann Archive/Getty Images

‘The Last Shah’ Review: A Purely Domestic Conspiracy

Michael Doran

Weaving conspiracy theories is a kind of art form in parts of the Middle East, and the Iranians are the undisputed masters. So pervasive is conspiracy theorizing in Iran that the “Encyclopaedia Iranica,” a scholarly guide to the country’s history and culture, contains a long and learned article documenting the many influential writers who attribute “the course of Persian history and politics to the machinations of hostile foreign powers and secret organizations.”

In their own style, Western writers, too, display a pronounced tendency to depict foreign decision-making as the main driver of modern Iran’s political history. Thus the Eurocentrism of Westerners and the conspiracy theorizing of Iranians work in parallel to produce histories that relegate Iranian leaders to bit parts in their own national drama.

Remedying this deficiency is the unstated but clear goal of Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a leading American analyst of contemporary Iran. His fifth book, “The Last Shah: America, Iran, and the Fall of the Pahlavi Dynasty,” offers an original interpretation that puts Iranian actors where they belong: at center stage. Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi is the main character, but Mr. Takeyh’s analysis rests on his portrayal of the traditional Iranian aristocracy—“the landlords, merchants, urban notables, and clerics” who helped the shah come to power in 1941 but whom he destroyed in the 1960s.

The shah regarded the traditional elite as an anachronistic impediment to modern government. To be sure, the aristocrats were fractious, scheming and zealously protective of their privileges, but along with their self-interest came a measure of social responsibility. In Mr. Takeyh’s view, their wealth was “tied to the land,” so they “could sense the peasants’ and laborers’ grievances and often responded to their distress.” They were the sinew connecting the big cities to the countryside.

Read the full review in The Wall Street Journal

Related Articles

The China Challenge Discussion Series

Aparna Pande

Hudson Institute and the Takshashila Institution hosted The China Challenge online discussion series over six weeks between August 28, 2020, and Octob...

Continue Reading

Iran Nuclear Talks

Michael Pregent

In an interview on BBC World News, Michael Pregent discusses IAEA inspections in Iran. ...

Watch Now

Diplomatic Differences

Michael R. Pompeo

In an interview with Shannon Bream on Fox News, Secretary Pompeo discusses the Trump administration’s foreign policy record as well as tensions with C...

Watch Now