Skip to main content

The United Nations and the Goldstone Report

Anne Bayefsky

The namesake of the infamous U.N. Goldstone Report, Richard Goldstone, suddenly confessed this past weekend in an article published by The Washington Post, that he had made a mistake. In September 2009, he and his U.N.-sponsored team made the wild accusation that Israel set out to murder civilians in the Gaza war rather than protect its own citizens from an unremitting genocidal campaign prosecuted for years by Palestinian terrorists.

Despite Richard Goldstones thirteenth hour confession, his diabolical legacy demonizing the state of Israel lives on at the United Nations. The body that created the Goldstone inquiry in 2009, the Human Rights Council, and the various entities that the Council has directed to implement his blood libel, have no intention of backing down. The facts be damned.

As of today, the U.N. system expects the Goldstone Report to be implemented as is. Four different follow-up activities are still percolating. These requirements emanate from a Human Rights Council resolution on the report that was adopted just a few weeks ago on March 25. Goldstone published his confession only after the Council once again pushed forward the implementation of his report timing he would have known well in advance.

First, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights is required to submit a progress report on the implementation of the [Goldstone report]to the Human Rights Council at its 18th session of September 2011. High Commissioner Navi Pillay will no doubt do everything in her power to keep it alive, since she was a main figure in sponsoring the report in the first place.

Prior to the decision of the Council in January 2009 to create the Goldstone inquiry, she first declared Israel guilty of egregious violations of human rights and then demanded credible, independent, and transparent investigations to identify violations and establish responsibilities. After the report was issued Pillay became Goldstones lead champion, repeating dozens of times the words she first wrote in the Huffington Post shortly after the reports release: I lend my full support to Justice Goldstone’s report and its recommendations.

Pillay event took the report to the U.N. Security Council. On July 7, 2010 Pillay was asked by the Council to address the issue of situations where the protection of civilians has been and remains of great concern. After noting the millions affected by atrocities around the world, the only plea she made in her statement to the Security Council on behalf of the peoples of this earth was: I urge the Security Council to support the recommendations of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, a.k.a., the Goldstone report.

Pillay, a native of Durban, South Africa who is similarly a lead champion of the Durban Declaration despite its deep-seated anti-semitism, is inextricably connected to the Goldstone report and its perjury against the Jewish state.

Second, the Secretary-General is required to present a comprehensive report on the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations of the [Goldstone Report]by all concerned parties, including United Nations bodies to the Council at its 18th session of September 2011. This mandate means the U.N. secretariat is required to ask large numbers of U.N. bodies for a report on what they in turn have done to implement the Goldstone Report, thus further spreading the reports tentacles across the U.N. system.

Third, the Human Rights Council has decide[d] to follow up on the implementation of the [Goldstone Report] at its 19th session of March 2012. So the Goldstone Report will come back to the Council next year.

Fourth, the Human Rights Council has asked the General Assembly to become more involved in promoting the report; it urges the Assembly to submit that [Goldstone] report to the Security Council for its consideration and appropriate action, including consideration of referral of the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court

Truth and falsehood have never been reliable attributes of the U.N. human rights system. And undoubtedly, the U.N. Human Rights Council which has expended so much effort to create and keep this scurrilous and bogus report alive will not skip a beat. The Obama administration has run out of excuses for remaining on the Council and forcing Americans to pay for it.

Related Articles

Everyone Knows We’re Arming up Because of China

John Lee

Take with a large grain of salt the diplomatic denials that the 2020 Strategic Defence Update and "commitment to spend $270bn on defence across the ne...

Continue Reading

How the U.S. Must Respond to China’s Exploitation of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Seth Cropsey & Harry Halem

On June 30, the Chinese Communist Party’s Standing Committee, the functional seat of power in mainland China, approved a “national security” law...

Continue Reading

The Realignment Ep. 38: Nick Timothy, the UK's Political Realignment

Marshall Kosloff & Saagar Enjeti

Nick Timothy, author of Remaking One Nation: The Future of Conservatism and former Chief of Staff to U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May, joins The Realig...

Listen Now