Skip to main content

Why Romney and Obama Kept Mum on Canada

Christopher Sands

In the three U.S. presidential candidates’ debates, and in one vice presidential candidates’ debate, Canada came up frequently. President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney took note of Canadian energy exports to the United States and the importance of the Keystone XL pipeline and other pipelines connecting the two countries. And Romney noted Canada’s corporate tax rate admiringly as well.

But in the final debate of this election season—the one devoted nominally to foreign policy—Canada did not come up at all. Is this cause for alarm or indignation?

No. Deepening economic integration between the United States and Canada has made Canada an integral part of the debates over the U.S. economy. Canada should have been—and was—part of the domestic policy debates. Even when it wasn’t mentioned by name, as the candidates focused on jobs and economic growth, they were talking about Canadian national interests as much as those of the United States itself. There was a lot said in these debates that related to Canada.

In contrast consider Europe—deep in an economic crisis, it came up only in passing, as the candidates made disparaging comparisons between U.S. debt and that of Greece and Spain. Mexico is a source of grave concern to Americans because of immigration and drug violence, yet the candidates avoided it. Or Japan—after Canada, China, and Mexico it is the largest U.S. trading partner and never was mentioned.

When Americans vote on November 6, they will render a final verdict on which candidate was most convincing in these debates. Canadians should not worry that they have been ignored this election season. Both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney take Canada and its importance to the United States seriously.

Yet historians of the U.S.-Canadian relationship may remember 2012 as the year that Canada was upgraded from the margins of American politics with scant attention in foreign policy debates to a much more central role in candidates’ competing visions for the United States economy.

Related Articles

In the Anglosphere, Diversity Is Strength

Walter Russell Mead

Without ever mentioning the name of Donald Trump, Canada has defined a new foreign policy agenda in stark opposition to the American President...

Continue Reading

A Note to Donald and Hillary: It's Time to Stop Fighting About the Results of the 2016 Presidential Campaign

Ronald Radosh

Every American knows that Donald Trump is our president, yet when he tells us for the 100th time, it sounds like he is unsure that he is....

Continue Reading

Macron Wins the First Round

Walter Russell Mead

Will a win for the "radical center" signal anything more than a slow decline of the status quo toward failure?...

Continue Reading