Skip to main content

Plan B: Climate Engineering to Cope With Global Warming

Lee Lane

In December 2009, the UN climate summit in Copenhagen ended with little to show for itself but a nonbinding agreement to keep on trying. That was no surprise: After all, 20 years of prior talks had yielded no discernable change in emissions. What is surprising, though, is that so many analysts continue to view climate policy as a thing apart from global power politics. Indeed, one needed really big blinders to miss the fact that the growing rivalry between the United States and China was central to the (in)action in Copenhagen.

Read more in the link below.

View PDF

Related Articles

The Economic Consequences of COP21

Irwin M. Stelzer

It is game, set and match to the president....

Continue Reading

A Manufactured "Success" in Paris

Walter Russell Mead & Jamie Horgan

The Paris negotiation was always a distraction from the real work of reducing humanity's planetary footprint....

Continue Reading

Fighting Fossil Fuel Subsidies

Walter Russell Mead

So many of the ideas of the global climate movement lead to such terrible policy, that it’s especially important to pay attention when climate activ...

Continue Reading