SVG
Commentary
Wall Street Journal

America’s Systemic Munitions Shortfall

The US needs more than new weapons. It needs new ways of enlisting allies to produce weapons.
 

william_schneider
william_schneider
Senior Fellow
Default Expert Image
David A. Deptula
William Schneider & David A. Deptula
Arleigh Burke–class guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance fires a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile in support of Operation Epic Fury on February 28, 2026. (US Navy)
Caption
Arleigh Burke–class guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance fires a Tomahawk Land Attack Missile in support of Operation Epic Fury on February 28, 2026. (US Navy)

The Pentagon announced on Aug. 17 a seven-year, $22.9 billion contract with Raytheon to increase Tomahawk production from roughly 60 missiles a year to more than 1,000. Washington, it seems, is ready to address the reality that the U.S. has been consuming advanced munitions faster than its industrial system replaces them.

But the munitions shortfall is more complex than industrial failure. It resulted from several interdependent factors: unstable defense budgets, overly optimistic assumptions about how long wars will last, shrinking production capacity, and restrictions on allied manufacturing. Appropriating more money and asking contractors to run production lines harder is the first step, but a long-term fix requires the U.S. to change the system that produced the current shortage.

Read in the Wall Street Journal.