Skip to main content

Why the Black Sea Matters

Sergiu Celac, Seth Cropsey, Dan Dungaciu, Iulian Fota & Cosmin Ionita

  1. The evolving strategic-military and political situation in the wider Black Sea is producing effects well beyond the confines of the region, affecting the basic security interests of the West, in particular those of the United
    States and its allies.
  2. A re-evaluation of security threats along NATO’s Southern and Eastern flanks appears to be necessary, with a clear differentiation between military and non-military challenges.
  3. Equal treatment should be given to the perceived vulnerabilities on the North (Baltic) and South (Black Sea) tiers of the NATO Eastern Flank, with an emphasis on proportionate increase of the allied dissuasion and deterrence capabilities in relation to the actual disposition of forces in the two theaters.
  4. A permanent NATO naval and air force presence in the Black Sea is fully justified with an aim to correct the emerging imbalance, possibly on a rotational basis in order to comply with the prescriptions of the Montreux
    Convention of 1936.
  5. The true nature and purpose of the protracted conflicts in the Black Sea basin need to be realistically assessed with a view to developing the appropriate political and diplomatic instruments for defusing their explosive
    potential and facilitating eventual resolution.
  6. The long-term consequences of Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea need to be considered, including legal and economic implications.

View PDF

Related Articles

Flurry of Kiev Assassinations a New Russian Front in Ukraine

Hannah Thoburn

If you didn’t know any better, you’d think the wild 90’s were back in Kyiv...

Continue Reading

David Satter on Trump, Putin, and Russia

David Satter

The Center for Security Policy's Secure Freedom Radio Podcast...

Listen Now

The G-20: Another Vacuous Meet-and-Greet

Walter Russell Mead

Walter Russell Mead in the Wall Street Journal...

Continue Reading