Skip to main content
Why Beijing Picked the Wrong Battle With Its Boycott Call
Chinese Ambassador to Australia Cheng Jingye poses during a photo shoot outside Parliament House in Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
Photo by Kym Smith / Newspix / Getty Images

Why Beijing Picked the Wrong Battle With Its Boycott Call

John Lee

We all know the adage: if you find yourself in a hole, stop digging. That is the folly of Beijing ordering ambassador Cheng Jingye to issue the threat that Chinese consumers might boycott Australian products and services in retaliation for Australia pushing for an investigation into the origins of COVID-19 and its initial spread.

If Beijing’s objective is to minimise criticism and deflect responsibility for its recklessness in unleashing a devastating pandemic, then it has erred with respect to target, issue and timing.

Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne is correct that the comments amount to ‘economic coercion’, and she should be praised for refusing to mince her words. It is an attempt at coercion by Beijing because any significant reduction in the purchase of Australian exports cannot occur without direct involvement of the regime, as it is achieved through changes in domestic regulations or else formal advisories issued to the population.

Read the full article in the Australian Financial Review

Related Articles

The End of American Illusion

Nadia Schadlow

Since the end of the Cold War, most U.S. policymakers have been beguiled by a set of illusions about the world order. ...

Continue Reading

Saffron India Is an Opportunity and Danger

Walter Russell Mead

Hindu nationalism’s rise will help the U.S. check Beijing but raises the risk of war....

Continue Reading

China's Aggression in the South China Sea

Michael Pillsbury

In an interview on with Lou Dobbs Fox Business, Michael Pillsbury discusses China’s growing military activity in the South China Sea. iframe#1...

Watch Now